Saturday, February 26, 2005
When Hugh Nibley taught Sunday School, you might not be surprised to know that he did not always strictly follow the manual, although he often did cover the section of the scriptures that we were presumably studying that week. One of my strongest memories is when, in the midst of covering the Old Testament, he chose to give a lecture on the meaning of the wadjet eye - the stylized Egyptian eye found on Facsimile 2 in the Book of Abraham (see the upper right-hand corner, Figure 3 - the eye is to the left of the orb above the seated god). The richness of ancient Egyptian concepts associated with that symbol are beautifully consistent with Joseph Smith's statement that Figure 3 is associated with the "grand Key-words of the Holy Priesthood" and with divine authority. It was a fascinating lesson, filled with one scholarly citation after another read from handwritten cards or notes regarding what the experts have said about this symbol. The lesson began vigorously as Nibley jumped into the topic and continued at top speed for the rest of the lesson. Unfortunately, he never bothered to point out what and where the wadjet eye was, and several people in front of me were whispering among themselves trying to figure out what on earth he was talking about. I had read some of his writings and could benefit somewhat from the actually fascinating lesson, but those who didn't already know what the wadjet eye was were left in the dark. I don't think he ever looked up to take questions, and I was too shy to interrupt. I guess I should have said something. So much for being a helpful assistant!
Sadly, he passed away as Martha Nibley Beck unleashed a book with some of the wildest and most unbelievable accusations you could imagine against this saintly man. All her other siblings have joined together to provide a firm and convincing defense of Brother Nibley.
Brother Nibley's writings laid a foundation for LDS apologetics, showing Mormons and the world that there are many powerful evidences supporting the claim of authenticity for the Book of Mormon and other LDS texts. Even more importantly for me, he provided a context to help Latter-day Saints appreciate the rich and ancient nature of the LDS Temple, greatly adding to the value of the experience there.
Somewhat like Joseph Smith, Hugh Nibley's name is being had for good and evil all over the world - but his legacy was one of great good, in spite of whatever weaknesses he had as a person or as a Gospel Doctrine teacher. The weaknesses I saw were actually symptoms of unbalanced strength and excessive focus. Would that these were the worst weaknesses of all the Lord's people.
The problem is not religion, it is power: when the wicked reign, the people (and their wives) mourn.
Friday, February 25, 2005
Their observations are worthy of some thought - and caught me somewhat by surprise. Previously, in poking a little fun at Michael Quinn's credibility-straining effort to find homoerotic elements in the friendships and writings of early LDS leaders, I did a spoof in which I pointed to the much more pervasive homoerotic elements in the Barney show. I don't think Barney is gay, pink dinosaur suit notwithstanding, but he certainly is not manly. Does the exposure to largely metrosexual wimps in cartoons and the lack of traditional male role models in cartoons or almost anywhere else in the media have a negative effect on our youth? Is part of the dangers of our worldly media not just the trash that they tend to dump on us, but also the lack of wholesome content?
Parents are used to filtering out raunchy content from their children's media diet, but perhaps we also need to worry about what is missing, particularly the lack of helpful role models when it comes to gender roles. Above all, this is a reminder that we must not rely on TV for the education of our children! The fewer hours, the better.
Wednesday, February 23, 2005
Tuesday, February 22, 2005
It [the knowledge of the Gospel] leads us to the endless and perfect end, teaching us beforehand the future life that we shall lead, according to God, and with gods; after we are freed from all punishment and penalty which we undergo, in consequence of our sins, for salutary discipline. After which redemption the reward and the honors are assigned to those who have become perfect; when they have got done with perfection, and ceased from all service, though it be holy service, and among saints. They become pure in heart, and near to the Lord, there awaits their restoration to everlasting contemplation; and they are called by the appellation of gods, being destined to sit on thrones with the other gods that have been first put in their places by the Savior.This early leader taught the concepts of eternal progression, of the need for obedience on our part to access the gift of grace from Christ, and of the exaltation of the righteous to be "gods" among other "gods" who will be with God (the God of all), thanks to the gift of eternal life made available to us by Christ.
Can you guess which leader this was? Brigham Young, perhaps? No, try again. Joseph Smith? Heber G. Grant? Hyrum Smith? No, no, no. . . .
Answer: this early leader of the Church was a leader in the original Church of Jesus Christ (more precisely, its second-century descendant). The passage comes from Saint Clement of Alexandria, one of the famous early Christian Fathers who wrote in the late second century, recognized as an authentic early Christian leader and defender of the faith. The quotation is from his Stromata 7:10. You can find this passage yourself on the page of Stromata 7 of Clement at EarlyChristianWritings.com, about halfway down the page, or read it on a similar page in Vol. 2 of the Ante-Nicene Fathers collection at the incredible Christian Classics Ethereal Library at Calvin College.
I hope those who condemn us for teaching such doctrines will be a little more consistent with their condemnation, and be sure to inform their congregations that the early Christian Fathers, as well as the Apostles and even Christ Himself (see John 10:34-35, for example), just don't qualify as Christians according to their standard of what "historic Christianity" is all about. As for us, well, it's nice to be in the company of such fellow "non-Christians."
Thanks to John Tvedtnes for calling attention to the interesting passage from Clement of Alexandria.
Saturday, February 19, 2005
Among Mormons, the addition of new children to a family doesn't have the same negative educational effects seen in most of the population, according to a study led by Douglas Downey, assistant professor of sociology at Ohio State University.Now here's a question: If you're Mormon and not planning to have a lot of kids, are you wasting a valuable sociological resource?
"Our results suggest Mormons have found ways to devote more resources to their children as family size increases," Downey said. "This helps their children continue to achieve academically."
In a 1995 study published in the American Sociological Review, Downey found that academic achievement among children dropped as family size grew because parents had less time and economic resources for each child. "Parents only have so much time and money, and we found that the more children they have, the more those resources are diluted," he said.
This new study was designed to see if the "resource dilution" explanation held true for groups, such as Mormons, in which large families are accepted and even encouraged. The results of the study showed that Mormon children didn't display the significant declines in educational performance that other children showed as family size increased. And one reason may be that resources parents devoted to children did not decline as significantly among Mormons as they did among the rest of the population, Downey said.
Hats off to you LDS families who manage to raise a lot of healthy and well educated kids (this is, of course, a subset of large Mormon families, but I think a pretty large subset). It's a huge amount of work, but thanks for blessing the lives of so many people. I know our society often fails to appreciate the marvelous accomplishment of raising children well, but it's one of the most valuable skills that can be found among any people. As the Prophet David O. McKay said, no other success compensates for failure in the home.
Friday, February 18, 2005
My heart yearns for Tibet and for their loss of religious freedom. The Tibetans are a brave and freedom loving people who suffer under ongoing oppression. Many have died in their quest for freedom - a quest largely ignored by the West. Do Latter-day Saints truly recognize how marvelous the gift of religious liberty is? Do we remember our own roots and our forefathers' escape from religious persecution, even in this free land? Do we stand up for the religious freedom of others?
May we stand for religious freedom in all lands. Tibet would be a good place to start.
I also look forward to the day when the many sacred records of the Tibetan people are more available for our perusal. We have much to learn from the religious writings of many peoples, and perhaps we might find some pearls of great price that are far more than just the philosophies and teachings of men, as wise and beautiful as those may be.
When I was in China briefly in 1987, while visiting the family of a friend in Beijing, I was introduced to an old man - I believe it was the grandfather - who had lived in Tibet and could read their scriptures. He showed me a volume and told me that the study of Tibetan writings had been his passion through his life. Our meeting was brief, but he left me with the impression that these writings were precious and worth his life's effort to study them.
May religious freedom some come to Tibet! Oh, and China, too. That is something we can at least pray for. The Lord has His ways - may it happen soon in those wonderful lands, if only for a season....
Thursday, February 17, 2005
Before the development of this method of translation, little more than dates could be deciphered from archaeological findings. With the new procedures, however, significant new information is now coming to light. For example, the name of the Jaredite king Kish, as well as his birthday, birthplace, and the day he ascended to the throne, may have been deciphered.Interestingly, while looking up some information on the well established Mesoamerican name Xul, known both among the Olmecs and the Mayans (a relatively common name, still in use, as I understand - it was also the name of a Mayan month), I found it is also preceded by the term "Kan" in another person's name from Palenque, as shown on the page http://www.jaguar-sun.com/glossary.html or at a page from the Colorado School of Mines. Xul is pronounced as "Shule" and may correspond with the Jaredite name Shule in the Book of Mormon.
On the Tablet of the Cross at Palenque are found engravings that trace the genealogy of Kan Balam, the son of King Pacal, who is buried in the great tomb there. Among the names of Kan Balam's royal ancestors is found what may be the full name of King Kish_U-Kish Kan, an ancient king of the Olmec culture.
Kan means serpent. One of the meanings of Kish is feathered. Now that the Maya code is being deciphered, the name of U-Kish Kan has been translated as "he of the feathered serpent."
This symbolic connection between U-Kish Kan with the feathered serpent suggests a relationship to Jesus Christ, whom the Jaredites knew to be the Mesoamerican Messiah or the white god of Mesoamerica who is also known as "the feathered serpent."
There are many other Book of Mormon names that appear to be authentic ancient Semitic names. It's interesting that tentative links to Mesoamerican names are also beginning to appear. An understanding of ancient Mesoamerica is many years behind our knowledge of the ancient Hebrews, of course - stay patient and stay tuned.
Sunday, February 13, 2005
The damage that pornography can do—to minds or cultures—is not by any means negligible. Especially in our modern age of passive entertainment, saturated as we are by an unending storm of noises and images and barren prattle, portrayals of violence or of sexual degradation possess a remarkable power to permeate, shape, and deprave the imagination; and the imagination is, after all, the wellspring of desire, of personality, of character. Anyone who would claim that constant or even regular exposure to pornography does not affect a person at the profoundest level of consciousness is either singularly stupid or singularly degenerate. Nor has the availability and profusion of pornography in modern Western culture any historical precedent. And the Internet has provided a means of distribution whose potentials we have scarcely begun to grasp. It is a medium of communication at once transnational and private, worldwide and discreet, universal and immediate. It is, as nothing else before it, the technology of what Gianni Vattimo calls the "transparent society," the technology of global instantaneity, which allows images to be acquired in a moment from almost anywhere, conversations of extraordinary intimacy to be conducted with faceless strangers across continents, relations to be forged and compacts struck in almost total secrecy, silently, in a virtual realm into which no one—certainly no parent—can intrude. I doubt that even the most technologically avant-garde among us can quite conceive how rapidly and how insidiously such a medium can alter the culture around us.The entire article is a great read. We are living in the midst of a tsunami. All of us need to act more vigorously than simply wading and putting up an occasional umbrella.
We are already, as it happens, a casually and chronically pornographic society. We dress young girls in clothes so scant and meretricious that honest harlots are all but bereft of any distinctive method for catching a lonely man’s eye. The popular songs and musical spectacles we allow our children to listen to and watch have transformed many of the classic divertissements of the bordello . . . into the staples of light entertainment. . . .
The youth in our ward had a trip to the Chicago temple yesterday (three-hour drive from here). Well worth the time. Such a wonderful place for selfless service (they got to do baptisms for the dead).
Friday, February 11, 2005
My father, William Dean Lindsay, showing the spot on my grandmother's property where he found his wedding ring many years ago as an answer to prayer.
Here's the story: Shortly after he was married, my father took my mother from Salt Lake down to St. George, Utah to visit her family (Maurice Jarvis Miles and Mary Lyon Miles). My mother's parents had a large backyard with many grape vines. My parents spent a lot of time in the backyard and picked many grapes, some of which they took back with them to Salt Lake. On the way back, just a few miles outside of St. George, my father realized that his wedding ring was missing. He guessed it must have fallen off while he was in the backyard, probably while picking grapes. The area where it could be was so large that it seemed hopeless to even look for it. They debated whether to go back or not, but decided to try to find it. First, though, they prayed for the Lord's help.
When they got to my grandparents' home, my Dad walked among the many rows of grapes and felt prompted to turn right at a particular point. As he turned and moved down they row, he immediately saw a glint of sunlight reflected from something on the ground - his ring.
He related this story as we were walking together in the backyard of my grandmother's home last May while we were in St. George for her funeral. He recalled the spot where he found the ring and pointed to it while I snapped this photo. Thanks, Dad!
That simple story reminds me of the day I recall the beginning of my own personal testimony about the power of prayer. I was six years old and had been having fun with a little magnifying glass my Dad lent me. I thought it was precious and thought he needed it for his job - now I realize it was a cheap plastic one with a value of about 10 cents. Unfortunately, I lost it during the day, and felt a great need to find it before my Dad came home. I thought I looked everywhere, but couldn't find it. I remember my mother's teachings about praying for help and decided that this was a time when I really needed God's help. I closed the door to my room, got on my knees and prayed for help to find the magnifying glass. As soon as I finished, I looked at my chest of drawers, walked over to it, opened a middle drawer, moved something, and there it was. I found it immediately after prayer. As a six-year-old, I had just experienced a direct answer to prayer, something that would be repeated many times in my life.
One of the greatest things my parents did for me as a child was to teach me to pray. How grateful I am for that gift from them, and for the reality of a Living God who hears us - and sometimes grants us answers that we can recognize as gifts from Him.
Thursday, February 10, 2005
Wednesday, February 09, 2005
Go to Google.com, click on images, and then search for a map of mexico at MIT by entering "mexico map MIT" and then hit enter. The first map image that is returned should be "mexico.jpg" with a URL from MIT.edu. Yes, it's a thumbnail of a real map of Mexico from MIT's Website. But when you click on it, you will be mysteriously redirected to my Book of Mormon Evidences page, a page that has no such maps on it.
The displayed link for the map is for an MIT.edu URL, but the actual shortcut does a tricky redirect to my site. The shortcut (right click on the previous link and copy the shortcut and paste it somewhere to see - this blog gets messed up if I try to display the long continuous string) is where the problem is - take a look.
The trick in the shortcut is that the displayed URL and the actual URL of the original image is for the map at MIT.edu, which follows the "imgurl=" string, but the actual URL that the link takes your browser to follows the "imgrefurl=" string, and points to my site. Hey, that's just not fair! The Google image service is hijacking people to a place they didn't want to go. I like my site and all, but the hijacking is wrong - and I'm embarrassed to be the "honored" recipient. Have any of you seen this kind of thing before?
Has a warped Mormon hacker taken over Google?
I received an angry e-mail from a professor demanding that I quit hijacking Google's image service. Boy, if I crooked enough and smart enough to hijack Google in that manner, I wouldn't be wasting my time blogging and running an amateur informational Website in spare moments of free time - I'd be taking over the World Bank or Microsoft. Honestly, I have no idea why Google is unfairly favoring my Book of Mormon Evidences page. For some reason, MIT's maps of Mexico are very popular, and the hijacking of Google is affecting nearly two thousand people every week, if my estimates are correct.
I have sent two e-mails to several groups at Google (no response yet after over a week) and to MIT's Web staff, and MIT confirms that it appears to be a Google problem. Here is one of my e-mails:
I'm getting thousands of IMPROPER extra hits from Google by people whoA few minutes ago, Google finally replied:
are searching for images of Mexico, finding images at mit.edu, and then
getting mysteriously redirected to a page of mine. When people search
for maps of Mexico in Google images, the displayed imgurl is not equal
to the imgrefurl. The latter redirects people to one of my pages at
I don't think MIT is doing this - it appears to be a bug at Google.
While I appreciate the traffic, something is clearly wrong. I don't have
maps of Mexico on my site. People trying to find maps of Mexico are
being misdirected to my site. This is not good. Is there some way to fix
Hi Jeff,I'm not convinced they appreciate the nature or seriousness of the problem. I hate to have them simply clear the cache for MIT's images - I'll ask MIT if they are OK with that. But something bizarre is going on here. Any thoughts?
Thank you for your note. We apologize for our delayed response. We can
remove the cached copy of this image from our search results. Google's
search results display cached copies of images so users can view an image
even if its server is down. A cached copy is a snapshot of the image from
the last time we visited it. Deleting the cached copy removes this
archived information from the web.
Please let us know if you would like us to delet this cached copy.
The Google Team
Tuesday, February 08, 2005
Monday, February 07, 2005
Then I needed to print out home teaching assignments to give to people in my quorum (I'm the H.P. Group Leader). With the DOS version, I could easily print out a page for each home teacher giving a listing of their families, addresses, phone numbers, etc. I can print out tables showing companionships and just giving the head of household of a family, with about 20 companionships per page, and not with the information they really need. Maybe there is a way to get the right information out, but after several attempts I ended up writing down one man's assignment by hand. Sweet. I'm told there is a way, but the Bishop has not yet found the Windows-based Urim and Thummim that MLS requires. Its help file is written for people who already know how to use the program effectively and just need to tweak something - it doesn't explain how to do basics.
Then our Relief Society President came in while I was on the computer and told me that she had spent a lot of time trying to figure out how to print out an attendance roll for her sisters. Ah, that's got to be easy, I thought. So I offered to help her. Look, one just has to select Relief Society, see, and then under this menu, just pick, uh, well, uh, maybe this, no, or this . . . no, she had tried all that. Every option had been pursued, with no roll in sight. I was a little flustered. I later learned from a more experienced user that rolls can be printed, but it requires a completely non-intuitive approach. To print the Relief Society roll, one must not select Relief Society as the desired organization, but "other," and then one will find a menu with organization rolls, from which one can then select Relief Society. Ah ha! Sweet.
It's a sweet program, all right, but not as sweet as the good ol' DOS version. When it comes to religious software, I guess Acts 3:19 is not yet fulfilled, and we must keep on waiting for the restitution of all things.
Below is my discussion of this topic from page 2 of my pages on the Book of Abraham (the cited references are on that page):
Figure 6: the four quarters of the earth
Figure 6 is the same as the four canopic figures under the lion couch of Facs. 1 and is said by Joseph to represent "this earth in its four quarters." How many farmers would have guessed that four little statues represented such a thing? But it is an entirely plausible explanation based on a modern understanding of Egyptian, and fits nicely into the themes of the hypocephalus. E. Wallis Budge explained, "These jars were under the protection of Isis, Nephthys, Neith, and Serqet, and represented the south, north, east, and west respectively" [Budge, 1904, 1:210]. In the forward to Budge's translation of the Book of the Dead, Budge wrote that the four "children of Horus" were each "supposed to be lord of one of the quarters of the world, and finally became the god of one of the cardinal points" [Budge, 1967, p. cxxiv, emphasis mine]. Joseph was absolutely correct.
According to John Gee [Gee, 1991], the four canopic vessels represent the four Sons of Horus, each of which has its own unique name, its own animal head, and its own cardinal direction. The link between the Sons of Horus and the cardinal directions was first established in 1857 [Brugsch, 1857], so Joseph could not have drawn upon scholarly knowledge in saying that they represented the four quarters of the earth. Indeed, there was essentially no valid knowledge of Egyptian to draw upon in 1842 when the Book of Abraham was published.
Stephen E. Thompson criticizes Joseph Smith's interpretation of Figure 4 [Thompson, 1995]. Concerning the claim of LDS scholars that the fours sons of Horus represent the four quarters of the earth, Thompson objects:
"As far as ancient Egypt is concerned, there is no evidence currently available to support this claim. There is only one context in which the sons of Horus are associated with the cardinal directions, i.e., 'the earth in its four quarters.' They were sent out, in the form of birds, as heralds of the king's coronation....I must emphasize that it is only in this context, and in the form of birds, that these gods were associated with the cardinal points. In the funerary context no such relationship is evident. Furthermore, the fact that these gods are sent to the four quarters of the earth does not mean that the Egyptians equated them with these directions. There is no evidence that they did so."Thompson's approach fascinates me. Instead of marveling at how Joseph could have guessed even a remotely plausible meaning for the canopic figures, he quibbles. After flatly stating that there is no evidence for a link to the four quarters of the earth, then he admits that there is only one context - coronations - in which such a link exists. He then denies the relevance of that link, alleging that Facsimile 2 is only a funerary scene. I wonder if he is unaware of what Hugh Nibley has been writing about Facsimile 2 for many years: that it centers around the concept of the endowment, which is the "coronation" of the resurrected soul in the kingdom of God. Indeed, non-LDS scholars acknowledge that figures of this type (the hypocephalus) are concerned with the life after, with a triumphant resurrection and entrance into eternity. It seems entirely reasonable to me to place Facsimile 2 into the context of a coronation scene, the one scene for which Thompson says the sons of Horus are linked to the four quarters of the earth. But Thompson can allow no room for plausibility in anything Joseph says.
I also disagree with Thompson's stance that only one context permits a relationship between the sons of Horus and the cardinal directions. John Gee provides others in his article. For example, in the Pyramid Texts, "the Sons of Horus are associated with the orientation of the four corners of the earth and used to orient the Pyramid" [Gee, 1991, p. 38]. They are also connected to winds from the four corners of the sky.
I feel that identifying the "four quarters" with the sons of Horus in Figure 6 is especially appropriate, since the four legs of the adjacent cow, Hathor = 'house of Horus', have a similar meaning mentioned in the quote from Campbell [discussed in connection with the upside down cow of Facs. 2 on my Book of Abraham page].
Still puzzled about Thompson's allegation, I borrowed a copy of Richard W. Wilkinson's Symbol and Magic in Egyptian Art [Wilkinson, 1994] from our local library. The discussion of the Sons of Horus in Wilkinson clearly links them to the four quarters of the earth or the four cardinal directions, with no hint at all that this connection only occurred during coronation ceremonies. For example, Wilkinson's glossary entry for the Sons of Horus explains that they "were four genii or minor deities connected with the cardinal points and which guarded the viscera of the deceased. Originally human-headed, they were regularly portrayed with the heads of different creatures: Imsety, human-headed (south); Duamutef, jackal-headed (east); Hapy, ape-headed (north); Qebesenuef, falcon-headed (west)" (p. 213). His section on the meaning of the number four notes that the four Sons of Horus were one of several groups of four commonly found in Egyptian art. Then he writes, "Frequently the number [four] appears to connote totality and completeness and is tied to the four cardinal points...The four cardinal points are certainly an ancient concept.... Usually ... the four areas represent the four quarters of the earth alone. This is the case in most religious rituals which find representational expressions" [Wilkinson, 1994, pp. 133-134, emphasis mine]. He does cite the coronation of the king as well as the jubilee ceremony as examples involving the cardinal directions, but there is no hint that the connection between the four Sons of Horus and the four quarters of the earth only occurs in a narrow and limited context.
Page 145 of Wilkinson shows a photograph of canopic jars (shaped as the Sons of Horus, containing human viscera) in a decorated chest (22nd Dynasty). Each side of the chest also has one of the four Sons of Horus on it, being protected by the goddesses Isis, Nephthys, Neith, and Selket. This concept is discussed on pages 70-71 in the context of placement of coffins, which were sometimes oriented with the cardinal directions (head to the north, with the body sideways facing east). The four Sons of Horus were sometimes placed on the long sides of the coffin, with two on the west side and two on the east. Wilkinson then notes that the Son of Horus are sometimes represented on the four sides of the chests in which canopic jars were stored. Again, the Sons of Horus are linked to directions in a context other than coronation rites alone. Joseph's "four quarters of the earth" remains a "direct hit," in my eyes. Now how can the critics explain that? If Joseph were a fraud, why the direct hits?
E. Wallis Budge, Gods of the Egyptians, or Studies in Egyptian Mythology 1 (1904), as cited by Welch, Reexploring the Book of Mormon, 1992, p. 148; and 2 (1969), New York: Dover, as cited by McGregor and Shirts, p. 218.
E. Wallis Budge, The Egyptian Book of the Dead, (New York: Dover, 1967, originally published 1895).
H. Brugsch, Die Geographie des alten Aegyptens, Leipzig, 1857, pp. 30-37, as cited by Gee, 1991.
John Gee, "Notes on the Sons of Horus," FARMS paper GEE-91, Provo, Utah: Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies, 1991.
Stephen E. Thompson, "Egyptology and the Book of Abraham," Dialogue, 28, no. 1 (Spring 1995): 143-162.
Richard W. Wilkinson, Symbol and Magic in Egyptian Art, (London: Thames and Hudson, 1994).
Saturday, February 05, 2005
Erica's Thoughts. Erica is a Jewish woman who takes her religion seriously and deals with issues that will resonate with many LDS people such as how to be a good corporate citizen in her work and still be true to the Sabbath (her post on this topic involved a corporate retreat that included a Saturday in Orlando). She also has an insightful discussion on anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism - is there a difference? I think Latter-day Saints can learn a lot from our religious Jewish brothers and sisters.
One item I found on her blog is a link to a story on how
the German welfare system may force women into prostitution. Now that the liberal German government has legalized prostitution, brothels are using government jobs services to hire employees. A provision in their welfare system specifies that welfare recipients under age 55 cannot receive unemployment benefits if they refuse to take a job. So already there has been a case of a woman losing benefits for refusing to work in a brothel. (Feb. 7 update: the first comment to this post indicates that this may be a false allegation due to some bad journalism from the London Telegraph. Stay tuned....)
Ah, the sweet fruits of socialism (here I go on one of my rants - please close this window now if you are offended by conservative views). I know my far-left friends will bristle at the suggestion of some kind of link between their political ideology and the degradation of women, but the basic Marxist call in the Communist Manifesto for the abolition of the family and the complete "equality" of women is ultimately a call to destroy the sacred roles of men and women as fathers and mothers and eradicate the respect that men must have for women. As in Plato's big-government republic, where the family is destroyed and women are essentially consigned to a state brothel operated according to principles of totalitarian eugenics (see Chapter 5 of The Republic, if you can bear such revolting "wisdom"), the Marxist mindset ultimately regards men and women as animals who procreate for the State and who have no other inherent value than to serve the State. (I suppose they are then "equal" in the sense of both being degraded from humans to mere cattle.) And the practical result of this Marxist "equality" is that women are nothing more than sex objects. It is no surprise to find that some of the most prominent American symbols of women's "liberation" live degraded lives of lonely immorality. "Women of the world, lock yourself inside a cage and rejoice: now you are liberated!" And if America is still too unliberated for you, please move to a more enlightened nation like Germany or the Netherlands where you can enjoy socialist compassion and find all sorts of interesting jobs. (Actually, try North Korea or Cuba or China or the Sudan if you want to experience the full benefits of socialism. They have plenty of openings. For some reason, there are more people risking their lives to get out than to get in.)
Uh hum. Excuse me. Where was I? Oh, yes, Erica's blog. Thanks for sharing your thoughts with the world!
Thursday, February 03, 2005
I would suggest that many external factors outside our choice influence our lives and the temptations we face. Whether it is biology, upbringing, peers, climate, sunspot activity, astrology, fluoride in the water, or a host of external factors, we each face different temptations and challenges that we must overcome. Some are easy, some seem to take a huge toll on us. Rather than share too much about my own weaknesses, let me give an example related to the Word of Wisdom, but one that can be applied to much more personal parts of our lives. Personally, I think I might be genetically predisposed to adore coffee - the aroma of some brews drives me crazy with desire - but for the cause of Zion and my own spiritual welfare, I must not yield to that temptation. Now that may seem like a pretty trivial thing compared to sexuality (not so, according to some coffee connoisseurs), but avoiding sexuality outside of marriage is asked of all of us, and for some, that has meant never experiencing physical intimacy - and it almost always means delaying that beyond what the world considers "normal."
Many heterosexual men and women, adhering to high standards of morality and high standards for a potential spouse, end up remaining single throughout their lives, though they wished to marry. For those who feel homosexual orientation and do not seek marriage, the standards of the Gospel still apply, and can be lived. We are each unique, and God knows and loves each of us - and will give us strength to abide by His commandments. He doesn't change the laws He asks us to live - but can change the hearts of those willing to live them.
Regardless of its origins, it is critically important to understand that homosexuals can change: for some, the change to heterosexual life in the confines of marriage has been possible and successful; for others, the change has been one of gaining self-control and resisting temptation, though the inclinations may remain. In no way am I declaring that all homosexuals can completely change and never feel homosexual inclinations, but for many, dramatic change has been possible. See my page, "Responding to Gay Activists: Homosexuality Can Be Changed." An excellent resource is DrThrockmorton.com, with lots of excellent material, including information about the documentary, I Do Exist. I bought a copy of that DVD and found it to be fascinating. Gay activists insist that no homosexual has ever changed, but this is simply an incredible lie. Not easy, but for those who wish to - and there are many - change is possible. And with God's help, I firmly believe that dramatic change is possible - certainly power to resist whatever moral temptation may come our way, regardless of genes and environment. That's good news for some.
Temptation may always be with us - I wish I could completely eliminate the lure of my own temptations that remind me of just how mortal I am, and how great the need to always be cautious and seek strength from the Lord to overcome temptation each day. As Paul put it so well, we must "work out our own salvation with fear and trembling" (that's from Philippians 2:12 - a verse that has been removed from many modern Bibles, it seems), and "let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest ye fall" (this oft-deleted verse is 1 Cor. 10:12).
- "Is God Only a Spirit?" by John Tvedtnes - showing that John 4:24 ("God is a spirit . . .") provides no reason to believe that God does not have a body, based on scriptural evidence from the writings of John and others that give insight into the real meaning of that often-quoted passage.
- "Did Brigham Young Say that He Would Kill an Adulterous Wife with a Javelin?" by Mike Parker - an essay that pokes holes in a favorite little attack of anti-Mormons. He was not advocating or trying to implement "blood atonement."
Well, it will be interesting watching Harry Reid in the Senate.
Any word on Ken Jennings' campaign for Senate?