tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7139169.post110576587246898211..comments2023-11-02T07:25:45.884-05:00Comments on Mormanity - a blog for those interested in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints: Federal Judge Rules: To Recognize Evolution as a Theory is UnconstitutionalJeff Lindsayhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08776493593387402607noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7139169.post-56216527556731017902013-10-22T23:58:58.849-05:002013-10-22T23:58:58.849-05:00Gravity is still in the theory state even though i...Gravity is still in the theory state even though it is widely excepted. People want proof of evolution but will fellow a higher power with nothing. There's islands that shows adaptation and failures. Turtles that could reproduce with eachother at one point no longer can because of change. this has happened since we've watch. There are faith base groups that could not disprove evolution so they created "intelligent design" knowing evolution can't be disproved. Its a theory because there is a few missing link but yearly we fill them up more and more. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02077320553642951168noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7139169.post-29074529877014686482009-01-26T22:45:00.000-06:002009-01-26T22:45:00.000-06:00Historical evolution is not a "scientific" theory....Historical evolution is not a "scientific" theory. The "scientific model" engages a process which requires an idea to be testable by experimentation. One does not test history by experimentation. <BR/><BR/>How much 1830 A.D. do you put in a test tube which how much New York soil, for how long, do determine whether it rained that year? The whole idea is obsurd. You don't do "scientific" experiments for something like that. It's far more sensible to find a record of rainfall or assume it rained and get on with life.<BR/><BR/>There is so much extrapolation and assumption in what people pretend to be "science" that new pictures of what is sure to have been true of the past come out to contradict former ones fairly frequently. <BR/><BR/>True science has brought about the finest, newest microscopes and much clearer understandings of cellular biology, bio-chemistry, and attendant understandings that chemical processes for creating cellular and subcellular structures and varied envitro chemical processes cannot be arranged by accident. <BR/><BR/>The scientific process is good. That is why the once somewhat sensible sounding idea of evolution (as a source of life) has now been rendered utterly rediculous by that process. <BR/><BR/>Evolution as a source of life? Fairytale. There's nothing scientific about it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7139169.post-1105834336142183742005-01-15T18:12:00.000-06:002005-01-15T18:12:00.000-06:00I'm not sure the sticker is unconstitutional (and ...I'm not sure the sticker is unconstitutional (and this may get appealed, depending upon funds) but it certainly was very unwise for the school district to do. Further it clearly is making a religious point, even if they are trying to do it in as innocuous fashion as possible. The big question to ask yourself is why the sticker is necessary and why they are putting it there. The whole issue about theory is misleading since <I>everything</I> in science is a theory.Clark Goblehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03876620613578404474noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7139169.post-1105775374018891142005-01-15T01:49:00.000-06:002005-01-15T01:49:00.000-06:00I wouldn't be a bit surprised if that were to happ...I wouldn't be a bit surprised if that were to happen, Jeff. I fear for my children, and I'm not even a mother yet!Thttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04335961314830333729noreply@blogger.com